Toggle Menu

News Room

Canada’s PMRA continues to conclude 2,4-D is acceptable for continued registration. The PMRA has concluded that 2,4-D does not pose a health risk under the current conditions of use in Canada. This decision comes after a review of extensive scientific data, including the latest assessments of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The PMRA has also concluded that there are no reasonable grounds to believe that 2,4‑D may cause an unacceptable environmental risk and value continues to be realized by Canadian farmers, ranchers, rights-of-way managers and homeowners.

2,4-D Research Task Force has prepared and submitted comments in response to the EPA’s Registration Review Draft Risk Assessments. The Task Force notes the EPA’s overall finding of no human health concerns and supports continued product stewardship to reduce any calculated levels of concern for non-target organisms, in order to preserve 2,4-D’s many beneficial uses. The EPA’s draft human health risk assessments states that the following risks are not of concern: dietary, residential, non-occupational, volatilization/residential bystander and aggregate risk estimates. Recent EPA review documents have noted that; “2,4-D is not likely to carcinogenic in humans.”

Review of EPA’s Draft Human Health Risk Assessment for 2,4-D align with previous findings. This review reinforces previous assessments by the EPA: 2,4‑D can continue to be used according to label instructions to protect food production and the environment. Ready to have your voice heard? Comment now on the re-assessment of 2,4-D by clicking here.

The 2,4-D Task Force is pleased to partner with the American Soybean Association and the Arkansas State Plant Board in the production of a new video to encourage producers to have on target applications.
Good neighbor relationships are vital to farmers, ranchers, and producers. To continue our strong heritage of stewardship, the 2,4-D Task Force encourages farmers to communicate with their neighbors, read and follow all label instructions and follow any additional state restrictions to avoid pesticide misuse.

New Study Supports EPA Conclusions on 2,4-D and Potential Endocrine Interactions

Updated farm worker study supports regulators’ findings on 2,4-D

2,4-D Research Task Force Website Wins Prestigious “Best of Show” at NAMA

Health Canada concludes Special Review and determines 2,4-D is acceptable for continued use

Forbes: A UN Agency That Should Be Headed For Its Own Last 'Roundup'

June 2015 IARC Review of 2,4-D

Download English

Hier herunterladen

Télécharger ici

Faça o download aqui

Descargar aquí

EPA Response to Concern for Schools Near Areas of Pesticide Use

USDA Issues Final Environmental Impact Statement on Enlist™ Corn and Soybeans

2,4-D Task Force II Response to NRDC Law Suit Filed on February 23, 2012

State Agriculture and Rural Leaders (SARL) Resolution on Invasive Species - January 8, 2012

Governments of Canada and Quebec reach NAFTA settlement regarding 2,4-D

Updated Task Force Response to NRDC Petition - August 4, 2010

Task Force Responds to NRDC Petition – February 23, 2009

Expert Survey Results: Media Coverage of Common Chemicals

Industry Task Force II on 2,4-D Research Data Comments on a Petition Seeking to Cancel 2,4-D and Revoke Tolerances

Health Canada Finds 2,4-D Can Be Used Safely

EPA Says No Special Review of 2,4-D Needed after Years of Research Data Prove it's Not a Human Carcinogen

Reviews by European Commission, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and World Health Organization confirm 2,4-D Not a Health Risk

2,4-D Completes EPA Review Process: Occupational and Residential Risks "Not of Concern"

Health Canada's PMRA issues re-evaluation on lawn and turf uses of 2,4-D